This seems to be the default approach -- just call Rails "as_json" or "to_json" methods on the model instance, which gets all of the model's database columns but none of the model's dynamic information. This example has an array of Message instances, and without any monkey-patching or overriding as_json, the effect of this will be to export all of the ActiveRecord fields of Message (but not other content such as attributes) as JSON elements. For example, if the Message model uses a "messages" table with a column called "title", this code would expose the value in that column as "title" in the JSON as well.
render :json => message_list.as_json
But if some of the database columns on the model are for internal use and not for the API, the API implementor needs to override the default behavior to include only the columns that are intended for the API:
# ... model for Message
def as_json(opts = {})
opts = {:only => [:title, :body, :thumbnail_url, :background_url, :action, :display_on_launch, :ok_button_string, :cancel_button_string]}
super(opts)
end
#... controller for Message
render :json => message_list.as_json
(One could also use "except" instead of "only" as an option for as_json, but then if a new column gets added to the Message model, it would automatically be added to the API whether you want it or not).
It gets even more complicated if some of the model's information needs to be converted, combined, or otherwise manipulated:
# ... model for Message
def as_json(opts = {})
# change id to be called message_id because existing clients use message_id
out = { 'message_id' => id.to_s(&:as_json) }
opts = {:only => [:title, :body, :thumbnail_url, :background_url, :action, :display_on_launch, :ok_button_string, :cancel_button_string]}
out.merge!(super(opts))
end
#... controller for Message
render :json => message_list.as_json
It starts to get ugly, and a lot of the ugliness lives in the Model, not the Controller... wait. Oops. In MVC, isn't this what the View is for?
Enter RJSON. This is a template type for Rails, by Tom Lieber. The Ruby hash (like a dictionary) is already very familiar to Ruby developers, so why not have the Ruby developer construct a hash in a template file. A RJSON template file named "messages.rjson" might look like this:
{
:messages => @messages.map do |msg|
{
:message_id => msg.id.to_s,
:title => msg.title,
:body => msg.body,
:thumbnail_url => msg.thumbnail_url,
:background_url => msg.background_url,
:action => msg.action,
:display_on_launch => msg.display_on_launch,
:ok_button_string => msg.ok_button_string,
:cancel_button_string => msg.cancel_button_string
}
}
And its controller looks like this, where @messages is the array placed in context for the view to use:
@messages = Message.find_all_by_user_id(user_id)
render :file => "messages"
This is simple, but even much more complicated examples remain readable. Partials can also be used; if some data structure gets re-used exactly the same way in more than one part of the API, that data structure can be a partial view. It's easy to see what the API should look like from the view, which is part of the point of views.
I recommend it, which is to say: by all means get your Web API prototyped quickly using as_json, but when you start to get serious about the API end-points and field names, documenting the API and keeping it stable, start using RJSON.
ETA: Tom pointed me to a recent gem published by somebody else with the same basic plan. It's also at github (same name, Jan de Poorter)
2 comments:
Did you receive my e-mails about rjson? I think that, for whatever reason, they're not getting through.
sorry for being slow about responding to email! I edited the above post to point to the RJSON gem you mentioned.
Post a Comment