In the example tonight, an IETF participant felt that a proposal had been improperly blocked by an area director. The IETF participant felt that an opaque process allowed the improper behavior to remain unobvious for a long time. But really, in what way can transparency fix that? The same personality clashes and technical disagreements will still occur, and any sufficiently flexible and powerful process is subject to being affected by those who run it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(182)
-
▼
July
(18)
- Law professor Neal Katyal has an editorial in toda...
- I just found a wierd article on self-modifying pro...
- I gathered a list today of notification work relat...
- For future reference: when emergencies involving m...
- Wired has a breathy article on the Apt. club where...
- If you're interested in a huge mess of photos from...
- Thank-you, Queen's Square mall in Yokohama! I st...
- Tech Central Station has an article today on wirel...
- I attended a working group meeting this morning of...
- "Transparency" is on many tongues, in discussions ...
- Here's me in a kimono! Last night at the IETF soci...
- What is it with us Canadians and navel-gazing surv...
- I'm in Japan, and really noticing the big screens ...
- Janis Ian wrote an article about music copying and...
- A New York Times opinion piece by Harvard/Penn pro...
- The National Post has a good article about why the...
- I understand it's "pick on the FBI" year (and they...
- I've been influenced by Landsburg's argument that ...
-
▼
July
(18)
No comments:
Post a Comment