Friday, December 06, 2002
You can now examine wine with a magnetic resonance spectroscope to see if it's gotten acidic. Of course, the gizmo will cost you a couple tens of thousands of dollars. But since the highest price paid for a case of wine at auction is reputedly $112,500, I expect there will be a couple early adopters anyway.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(182)
-
▼
December
(24)
- Cory Doctorow links to an article about saving the...
- Is it really so easy to create a hoax that, when s...
- Volokh posts on water privatization, and a reader ...
- I'm back from vacation.
- Good grief. Matt Smith complains that "Calculated...
- More info on risk, particularly traffic related. F...
- I frequently talk to people about risk assessment ...
- Joel Spolsky, aka "Joel on Software", has a fun ra...
- In the NYT editorial pages today, Nicholas D. Kris...
- In addition to several rankings of countries' econ...
- This NYT editorial by Harvard History professor Li...
- If I can paraphrase Innocents Abroad: he writes th...
- If your breasts are larger than DD, read Cat's sit...
- Volokh says that Fumento says (in Reason Online) t...
- I never heard about this recently deceased police ...
- First and second generation immigrants are quite d...
- Maybe this is why I don't like UDDI -- as Sean McG...
- You can now examine wine with a magnetic resonance...
- I just found a slightly dated paper on AOL interop...
- Presence standards for buddy lists (seeing who's o...
- A bunch of bloggers I read occasionally (often lin...
- Google ZeitGeist is still there, though it's getti...
- Chris asked me about mercury levels, how dangerous...
- Now this would be a truly useful genetic modificat...
-
▼
December
(24)
No comments:
Post a Comment