Thursday, June 05, 2003
The message in this comic (where an Indian programmer, I think, educates a dumb white American sales guy) passes for enlightened. But it's simply not true that globalization lowers the standard of living for Americans while raising it for less prosperous countries. The most common outcome of any specific example of globalization (e.g. reducing garment import taxes decreases consumption of US-made garments) is for a small set of US workers to lose their jobs or change jobs, while every US consumer benefits from lower costs of goods. Lower costs of goods is generally understood as an increase in standard of living.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(163)
-
▼
June
(16)
- I'm published again, another WebDAV article, this ...
- One of the nice things about growing up Canadian i...
- I may not be a crank, but I'm certainly a geek. I ...
- I'm not the only one particularly enraged with pee...
- I'm sorry, I have to say this. I'm sure you would...
- The Agitator posts on why he's leaning more to the...
- It's always been difficult to identify the real lo...
- Ahh, the good ol' days (ref):One time, a group of ...
- David Gelernter suggests that the next great Ameri...
- The Protato (amaranth protein genes spliced into a...
- The Underground Grammarian describes crackpot sche...
- I went to a very small school in rural Ontario for...
- The message in this comic (where an Indian program...
- I'm morally opposed to the bumper stickers police ...
- This seems like a fascinating conference (link via...
- I've only started hearing about commercial establi...
-
▼
June
(16)
No comments:
Post a Comment