Tuesday, May 21, 2002
Science reporting can suffer from a problem I hadn't even considered: that of citing retracted studies. A study of 235 retracted scientific journal articles showed that these articles were cited 2034 times after being retracted (in addition to being cited before being retracted). Let's hope that study hasn't been retracted.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2002
(182)
-
▼
May
(20)
- Is it really Hollywood vs Silicon Valley in the IP...
- If you haven't seen Jonathan Last's Case for the [...
- Science reporting can suffer from a problem I hadn...
- Now that Title IX is being relaxed, many columnist...
- The Instant Messaging standards proposal, based on...
- There's a fine line between reality and satire. Th...
- Instant Messaging (IM) interoperability has long f...
- Bad User Interface design is not unique to the Web...
- Amnesty International is weakening its punches by ...
- Dan Simon perfectly correctly points out that men ...
- Thomas Friedman worries that the war against terro...
- Almost a third of Americans consider Canada just a...
- Trading cards are everywhere! It used to be sports...
- I found an article on ZNet today epitomizing some ...
- I agree with Ann Marlowe that the tradition of exp...
- Still on the subject of the French presidential el...
- It seems popular to explain away votes for right-w...
- The Internet is for Everyone, according to Vint Ce...
- Politicians are more prone than most to abusing nu...
- Science reporting isn't only poor in mainstream me...
-
▼
May
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment